Miranda v. Arizona (1966) is primarily associated with which amendment?

The case of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) is deeply connected to the Fifth Amendment, which protects against self-incrimination. In this landmark decision, the Supreme Court ruled that individuals taken into police custody must be informed of their rights to remain silent and to have an attorney present during questioning. This requirement stems from the need to ensure that any statement made by a suspect is truly voluntary and not coerced, thus safeguarding the suspect's right against self-incrimination guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment. This case established what are now known as "Miranda rights," which law enforcement is obligated to convey to suspects to uphold constitutional protections.

Other amendments mentioned, such as the First Amendment, pertains to free speech and expression, the Fourth Amendment deals with unlawful searches and seizures, and the Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to a fair trial and legal counsel. However, it is the Fifth Amendment that directly addresses the issues of self-incrimination that are central to the Miranda decision.